Finding Jesus – Faith, Fact, Forgery – E01 – The Shroud Of Turin – Full Show

Finding Jesus – Faith, Fact, Forgery – E01 – The Shroud Of Turin – Full Show

Finding Jesus – Faith, Fact, Forgery – E01 – The Shroud Of Turin – Full Show Exploring the possibility of a linen cloth bearing the image of a crucified man being the same shroud that Jesus…

38
Like
Save

Comments

Negro Fino says:

It’s probably gonna be one of these things where they go in circles, and
then in the end they’re still asking the same question.

PuckDuck85 says:

It’s really shocking that CNN would not make more mention of the fact that
the carbon dating of the shroud was discredited years ago, BY THE PEOPLE
THAT CONDUCTED THE STUDY !! Read this:

” Raymond Rogers, who conducted chemical analysis for the Shroud of Turin
Research Project and who was involved in work with the Shroud since the
STURP project began in 1978. Raymond Rogers argued in a 2005 article that
the chemical analysis he performed on unprovenanced threads sent to him by
a clergyman who was not authorized to possess shroud material, show traces
of tanning products, likely used by medieval weavers to match the colour of
the original weave when performing repairs and backing the shroud for
additional protection, and stated: “The radiocarbon sample contains both a
gum/dye/mordant coating and cotton fibers. The main part of the shroud does
not contain these materials”.[41] Rogers stated that after further study he
was convinced that: “The worst possible sample for carbon dating was
taken.”[42] Rogers made his analysis with documented samples.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_14_dating_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin

Or, fromthe London Telegraph…

“Rogers, a chemist from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico,
said: “I don’t believe in miracles that defy the laws of nature. After the
1988 investigation I’d given up on the shroud.
“But now I am coming to the conclusion that it has a very good chance of
being the piece of cloth that was used to bury the historic” Jesus.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/5137163/Turin-Shroud-could-be-genuine-as-carbon-dating-was-flawed.html

Come on CNN, you should know better.

Fuzzy Wuzzy says:

Which of the 26 “official” shrouds is this one?

Ralf Oblivion says:

There was a much more indepth documentary a few years ago … 3D imagery ,
the “support” edges being used for the dating etc … that show was
fantastic and left no doubt .
Also just a thought – how about a truthful documentary on mohammad’s
existence , his life and deeds ?
We all know the many reasons as to why CNN would never touch it 

Negro Fino says:

Good post you’re the only one

Davon Mcgruder says:

LIES!!!!!!!!

Comments are disabled for this post.